Russ of the BML
10:32 Tue Apr 18
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
Alex V 6:25 Mon Apr 17
Another cracking "Crystal ball" comment from the master of sounding clever but actually spouting bollocks.
|
Rossal
9:59 Tue Apr 18
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
Dont want to see him in a West Ham shirt again
He's had too many chances now, refusing to be on the bench after months out who does he think he is ?
Sell or release in summer....just get rid
We dont need him for the remaining games, would rather give Fletcher a shot to prove his worth. He has been around all season travelling and hardly getting any mins. Seems to work hard, doesnt moan give him a shot rather then cunts like Sakho
|
Willtell
8:51 Tue Apr 18
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
In my day as a player the only time players spoke out was when they thought the manager was a completely clueless cunt...
|
Sniper
1:24 Tue Apr 18
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
Idiot has a history of doing his - didn't bilic freeze him out after he refused to be a sub last season until he apologised to the squad?
I say we have two options - either mothball him sort of berahino style (tried already, didn't really work) or say 'alright count, go out there today and prove you're worth it'
If he's significantly better than what we've got going already (practically nothing) then keep playing him and admit you were wrong to leave him out. If he's shit, take him off before half time and tell him next time to keep his shitty hair dos to himself and his gob shut
|
DukeofDevo
1:20 Tue Apr 18
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
Yeah we're going to need all the players we've got to get anything against Everton Saturday, at one end Lukaku is going to have a field day against our defence
At the other end I can't see us troubling them at all
0-2 to the Toffees I'm afraid!
|
Full Claret Jacket
1:11 Tue Apr 18
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
DukeofDevo 4:27 Mon Apr 17
I also think Sakho should be playing and getting back to match fitness. Probably the best forward we had before all the crap which surrounded his injury with the national team. He has never given less than 100% on the pitch that I've seen.
He might be a handful to manage but this is what it's like in the top league and you have to find a way to get the best team playing together.
I'm sick of these fall outs with players. It stinks of poor player management and a total failure building a relationship with your players.
|
VirginiaHam
12:08 Tue Apr 18
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
Takashi Miike 1:27 Mon Apr 17
Agree; Sakho is lucky to be paid for doing something we'd do for a 10th of the wage.
|
Willtell
8:05 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
Tits McGee won't pay him I'll bet....
|
Any Old Iron
6:49 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
The bloke has to be as thick as pig shit. With his record of injuries and trouble making no club is going to come in to offer him a decent contract. He's just too much of a risk.
We've already suffered at the hands of one troublemaker this season and it's time we stopped taking this kind of shit from dodgy foreigners.
If I were the owners I'd instruct Bilic to give the bloke an ultimatum - either do as the manager tells him, or we as a club would treat it as Sakho withdrawing his labour and stop paying him, until such time as he apologises and gives an assurance that he will work to instruction.
Just how ungrateful must this cunt be after the all the help and money that the club have thrown at him while injured for so long.
|
Alex V
6:25 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
We should have got the best out of Sakho and then quickly moved him on. The leaden decision making at the club has let him hang around like a bad smell. Okay the injury issue was bad luck with the West Brom move last Summer, but the club had plenty of opportunity before that to sort it out.
|
BubblesCyprus
6:12 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
When Sakho signed for us the only other Club who put in a serious bid was the European GIANTS of Apoel Nicosia whose Club House I can see from my Office at home.
It told me everything I needed to know about him.
|
Kaiser Zoso
6:00 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
Bilic is doing a fair job of undermining himself, there isn't one satisfactory aspect of our club or performances this season, out of all competitions the moment they start, bust ups with players, shit style one up front football
All this on the back of missing out on Campions League last season.
|
Charoo
5:14 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
Big Ron would have said it straight on this one!
|
DukeofDevo
4:27 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
Yeah I seem to be in a minority of one here that would have him in the side, not that that's a problem!
Shame that one of our best signings in recent years has fallen so far out of favour!
|
Trevor B
1:35 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
Sakho probably has a worse appearance record now than Carroll, most of that being down to his refusal to have a back op at the end of his first season, and subsequently being injured and in and out of the squad ever since. Not to mention his supposedly other 'issues'. The medical staff have been unwilling to give their full backing to Sakho's fitness to play because they probably know he will break down again pretty soon. Just because the player thinks he is fit enough to play that doesn't mean he is, and whilst he is a paid employee of the club he should respect the manager's, and medical staff's, opinion, especially as many of his absences seemingly have been down to the player himself.
|
Alvin
1:27 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
We need a player like Ayew, with the knack of being in the right place to score, even if they are tap-ins
|
Takashi Miike
1:27 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
until sakho is named head coach or manager, the cunt should get his mentalist arse on the bench and do as he's told. I'm sure the cunt will still expect his wages this week, I'm sick of these lazy trouble makers. clearly all these 'details' are coming from one of the owners or sullivan's mini mes, so why don't they as owners discipline their employee instead of undermining the manager via their contacts in the gutter press
|
1964
1:16 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
As they say - no smoke without fire.
|
13 Brentford Rd
1:12 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
If I ever see this CUNT again in our shirt he will get dogs abuse!
From The Sun.... .
"Diafra saks it off.
Diafra Sakho and Slaven Bilic got in blazing row before Sunderland draw after striker refused to go on bench
Senegal star believes he was fit to start against the doomed Black Cats but boss did not agree
Exclusive By Daniel Cutts
DIAFRA SAKHO had a huge bust-up with West Ham boss Slaven Bilic before yesterday’s draw with Sunderland after he REFUSED to go on the bench.
The Senegal striker is making his way back into the Hammers first-team fold after being sidelined for more than three months with a chronic back problem.
He believes he was fit to start against the doomed Black Cats, but Bilic was set to put him on the bench for the third match running.
The 27-year-old made it clear to the ex-Croatia chief he would NOT be travelling with the West Ham squad and declared himself injured again.
It is thought he was left back in London, where his future with the club is set to be decided, and he is expected to be axed in the summer"
|
Crassus
10:45 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
If there is any truth in this then both Bilic and Sakho should be shot up the road come June
Sakho for playing up, again
Bilic for fucking up, again
|
dolph
10:08 Mon Apr 17
Re: Sakho refused to be sub
|
Duke's having a mare on here
|
| 
